The Paragraph

Original essays, literary criticism, and illustrated reflections on society and everyday life.

Supreme Court archive series

The Freedom Not to Join In

Article by

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette

The case

West Virginia required public-school pupils to salute the flag and recite a pledge. Children who refused could be expelled, with further consequences under compulsory-attendance rules. Jehovah's Witness families challenged the requirement because their religious beliefs prohibited the salute.

The setting mattered: the state was requiring a public expression of allegiance from children whose access to school depended on compliance.

What the Court decided

The Supreme Court held that the compulsory salute and pledge violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Justice Robert Jackson's opinion rejected the idea that national unity justified forcing individuals to affirm an official belief.

The reasoning did not depend on deciding whether the families' religious objections were correct or sufficiently persuasive. It protected freedom of mind against this form of state compulsion. The Court overruled its earlier decision in Minersville School District v. Gobitis, which had upheld a flag-salute requirement.

Why it is worth thinking about

There is a difference between teaching people about a political community and demanding that they perform agreement with it. The outward action can look the same whether it expresses conviction, fear, or simple compliance. Compulsion produces a visible ceremony; it cannot establish the sincerity the ceremony is supposed to signify.

Barnette therefore raises a question about the kind of unity worth having. A community may be stronger when people can belong without pretending that every shared symbol means the same thing to them.

The reversal of Gobitis is another part of the story. Respect for legal continuity did not prevent the Court from acknowledging that its earlier constitutional judgment should not stand. Institutional authority can sometimes require an explained correction rather than an increasingly elaborate defence of consistency.


Read the decision

West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette — archived U.S. Reports scan (PDF)

319 U.S. 624 (1943). Reading reference: pp. 626–642 in the printed report. Archive: Library of Congress, United States Reports collection.

Pass it on

Share by email · Share on LinkedIn · Share on X · Share on Threads

Keep a little room for longer thinking

Receive occasional essays and reading notes on fairness, literature and everyday life, straight to your inbox.

Unsubscribe at any time. Privacy notice · Powered by Buttondown